Make vs Workato vs eZintegrations: Choosing the Right iPaaS for Enterprise-Scale Integration and Automation
December 18, 2025TL; DR
- iPaaS (Integration Platform as a Service) helps enterprises connect systems, automate workflows, and eliminate data silos across cloud, on-premises, and legacy environments.
- Make is best for small teams and simple SaaS automations, but it struggles with scale, hybrid systems, and enterprise governance.
- Workato suits mid-to-large enterprises focused mainly on SaaS-based integrations, though costs can rise with complexity and data volume.
- eZintegrations is designed for enterprise-scale, hybrid, and data-intensive environments, supporting cloud apps, legacy systems, databases, data warehouses, APIs, and IoT from a single platform.
Choose Make for simple automation. Choose Workato for SaaS-centric enterprise workflows. Choose eZintegrations if you need a future-proof iPaaS for complex, hybrid, and large-scale enterprise integration.
Why eZintegrations stands out:
- Broad connectivity across cloud, on-premises, legacy, and IoT systems
- Low-code/no-code usability for business users
- Enterprise-grade scalability, security, and compliance
- Unified integration, automation, and analytics capabilities
- More predictable pricing and lower long-term total cost of ownership
Introduction: Why iPaaS Matters for Modern Enterprises
Modern enterprises operate across a wide ecosystem of systems, including CRMs, ERPs, data warehouses, marketing platforms, SaaS applications, legacy on-premises systems, and IoT devices. When these systems are not integrated, data remains siloed, workflows become manual, and operational efficiency declines.
What is iPaaS?
An Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) is a cloud-based middleware solution that connects applications and data sources through prebuilt connectors, APIs, and workflows. It enables organizations to automate processes, synchronize data in real time or batches, and maintain consistent data flow across the enterprise.
As enterprises evaluate iPaaS solutions, Make, Workato, and eZintegrations are frequently compared. While all three enable automation and integration, they differ significantly in scalability, enterprise readiness, security, and long-term cost efficiency.
This article provides a detailed, enterprise-focused comparison and explains why eZintegrations is often better suited for complex, scalable, and hybrid integration environments.
Company Overview: Make vs Workato vs eZintegrations
What is the primary difference between Make, Workato, and eZintegrations?
Short answer:
Make focuses on lightweight SaaS automation, Workato targets enterprise SaaS orchestration, and eZintegrations is built for full-scale enterprise and hybrid data integration.
Make
Make is a visual automation platform popular among small and mid-sized businesses. It provides prebuilt connectors for common SaaS tools and supports REST APIs, HTTP modules, and webhooks.
When Make is suitable:
-
Teams working mainly with cloud-based SaaS tools
-
Low to moderate data volumes
-
Simple, linear automation workflows
Key limitation:
Make is not optimized for high-volume data processing, hybrid deployments, or complex enterprise governance requirements.
Workato
Workato positions itself as an enterprise-ready iPaaS with a large connector ecosystem. It supports integrations across CRMs, ERPs, databases, and cloud platforms, while allowing business users to create workflows through templates.
When Workato is suitable:
-
Mid to large enterprises using primarily SaaS systems
-
Department-level automation (finance, HR, customer success)
-
API-driven integrations with moderate complexity
Key limitation:
Costs can increase at scale, and deeper data engineering or analytics workflows may require additional tools.
eZintegrations
eZintegrations is a cloud-based enterprise iPaaS designed for hybrid, data-intensive, and mission-critical environments. It supports databases, APIs, legacy systems, IoT data sources, data warehouses, and unstructured data through a low-code/no-code interface.
When eZintegrations is suitable:
-
Enterprises with legacy + cloud systems
-
High-volume, real-time, or batch data integration
-
Centralized automation, analytics, and data pipelines
Product and Integration Capabilities
How do integration capabilities differ across platforms?
Short answer:
Make focuses on SaaS automation, Workato offers enterprise SaaS connectors, and eZintegrations supports full-spectrum enterprise data integration.
Definition:
Integration capability refers to how many systems a platform can connect, how data is transformed, and how reliably workflows operate at scale.
Make
-
SaaS-focused connectors (CRM, marketing, productivity tools)
-
REST, HTTP, and webhook support
-
Visual workflow builder
Best for: Simple automation with limited data complexity
Not ideal for: Large datasets, legacy databases, or real-time enterprise synchronization
Workato
-
Enterprise SaaS connectors (CRM, ERP, databases)
-
Custom connector SDK
-
Built-in error handling and orchestration
Best for: Enterprise SaaS integration with departmental automation needs
eZintegrations
-
Connectivity across cloud apps, on-premises systems, SQL/NoSQL databases, data warehouses, APIs (REST, SOAP, GraphQL), IoT streams, files, and logs
-
Supports ETL, ELT, real-time sync, and event-driven workflows
-
API Marketplace with enterprise templates
Enterprise advantage: One platform for integration, automation, and analytics pipelines.
Deployment Models and Hybrid Readiness
Which iPaaS platforms support hybrid environments?
Short answer:
Workato and eZintegrations support hybrid deployments; Make is primarily cloud-only.
Definition:
Hybrid deployment means integrating cloud applications with on-premises or firewall-protected systems.
-
Make: SaaS-only, best for cloud-native stacks
-
Workato: Cloud iPaaS with private agents for on-premises connectivity
-
eZintegrations: Designed for hybrid and complex enterprise IT environments
Why it matters:
According to Gartner’s iPaaS Market Guide, over 70% of large enterprises operate hybrid architectures, making hybrid support a critical requirement.
Scalability and Performance
Which platform handles enterprise-scale data best?
Short answer:
eZintegrations and Workato scale for enterprise workloads; Make is better suited for smaller volumes.
Definition:
Scalability refers to a platform’s ability to handle growing data volumes, concurrent workflows, and real-time integrations.
-
Make: Limited by operation-based quotas and execution limits
-
Workato: Enterprise-grade orchestration with scalable throughput
-
eZintegrations: Built for high-volume real-time and batch data pipelines across ERP, CRM, data warehouses, and IoT
Example:
Enterprise iPaaS platforms commonly process millions of records per day across operational and analytical systems.
Security, Compliance, and Governance
How secure are these iPaaS platforms?
Short answer:
Workato and eZintegrations provide enterprise-grade security; Make offers basic protections.
Key security features defined:
-
Encryption at rest and in transit: Protects data during storage and transfer
-
Role-based access control (RBAC): Limits access based on user roles
-
Audit trails: Tracks integration activity for compliance
-
Make: Adequate for SMB use cases
-
Workato: Strong governance, regional data centers, compliance alignment
-
eZintegrations: Encryption, RBAC, secure connectors, and compliance support for regulated industries
Use case:
Healthcare, finance, and insurance organizations require platforms aligned with standards such as NIST security frameworks.
Customization and Development Flexibility
How customizable are these platforms?
Short answer:
Workato and eZintegrations offer high flexibility; Make supports limited customization.
-
Make: Manual API connections using HTTP modules
-
Workato: SDK for private connectors and advanced logic
-
eZintegrations: No-code/low-code workflow creation with advanced data transformation
Enterprise benefit:
eZintegrations minimizes custom code while still supporting complex enterprise workflows.
Connectivity Protocols and Enterprise System Support
Which platform supports the widest range of systems?
Short answer:
eZintegrations supports the broadest range of protocols and enterprise systems.
-
Make: REST, HTTP, webhooks for SaaS APIs
-
Workato: SaaS, enterprise apps, custom APIs
-
eZintegrations: REST, SOAP, GraphQL, gRPC, databases, data warehouses, IoT, files, and unstructured data
Supported systems include:
ERP, CRM, eCommerce, EHR platforms, Microsoft, Oracle, Salesforce, and enterprise databases.
Business Process Automation, Analytics, and Monitoring
Which platform supports end-to-end automation and analytics?
Short answer:
eZintegrations provides the most unified automation-to-analytics capability.
-
Make: Workflow execution monitoring only
-
Workato: Strong workflow orchestration and logging
-
eZintegrations: Dashboards, error monitoring, data lineage, real-time sync, and data warehouse ingestion
Why it matters:
Enterprises increasingly integrate operational data directly into analytics platforms for real-time decision-making.
Pricing Transparency and Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
Which platform offers better long-term cost efficiency?
Short answer:
eZintegrations often delivers lower enterprise TCO.
-
Make: Operation-based pricing that scales poorly with volume
-
Workato: Higher enterprise pricing with robust capabilities
-
eZintegrations: Usage- and complexity-based pricing designed for scale
Community, Ecosystem, and Support
How mature is the ecosystem for each platform?
-
Make: Active SMB-focused community and templates
-
Workato: Mature enterprise ecosystem and partners
-
eZintegrations: Rapidly growing marketplace with many prebuilt connectors and APIs
While eZintegrations’ community is still expanding, enterprise customers benefit from structured vendor support and migration assistance.
Comparison Table (Make vs Workato vs eZintegrations)
| Feature / Criterion | Make | Workato | eZintegrations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Use Case | Cloud app automation for small and medium business teams | Enterprise automation across SaaS and enterprise systems with scalable integration | Enterprise integration for complex data flows, legacy and cloud systems, data warehouses, and IoT |
| Deployment | SaaS cloud only | Cloud with options for hybrid or private agent deployment | SaaS supporting hybrid, cloud, and complex enterprise environments |
| Connectivity | SaaS connectors, REST APIs, and webhooks | Large catalog of connectors with custom connector support | Broad connectivity including databases, REST, SOAP, GraphQL, APIs, data warehouses, IoT, and on-premises systems |
| Ease of Use | Suitable for basic to moderately complex automations with minimal technical skills | Templates and UI with enterprise features accessible to business teams | No-code drag-and-drop mapping with minimal coding, designed for business users |
| Scalability & Performance | Moderate, may struggle with high-volume workflows | High, enterprise-grade orchestration and throughput | High, designed for large-volume real-time synchronization and hybrid workloads |
| Security & Compliance | Basic security adequate for small to medium workloads | Enterprise-grade security and compliance | Data encryption in transit and at rest, role-based access, and enterprise compliance |
| Customization & Flexibility | Limited connectors and custom API calls | High flexibility with custom connectors, workflows, and APIs | High flexibility with custom connectors, broad protocols, and advanced data transformations |
| Analytics, Reporting & Monitoring | Basic automation monitoring | Strong workflow monitoring, logs, and orchestration | Integrated dashboards, error logs, data lineage, real-time monitoring, and data warehouse connectivity |
| Integration with ERP, CRM & Major Systems | Limited, depending on available connectors | Broad support including major enterprise applications | Broad support for ERP, CRM, data warehouses, eCommerce, IoT, on-premise, and cloud systems |
| Pricing & TCO | Operation-based pricing that may increase with heavy usage | Higher enterprise pricing but scalable | Usage- and complexity-based pricing with potentially lower total cost of ownership |
| Community & Ecosystem | Moderate community support | Mature and well-established ecosystem | Growing ecosystem with prebuilt connectors, partner integrations, and an expanding marketplace |
| Ideal For | Small to medium business teams needing simple automation | Mid to large enterprises with cloud and SaaS integration needs | Enterprises with hybrid systems, complex data flows, and requirements for flexibility, scalability, and security |
Why Choose eZintegrations Over Make or Workato?
Key Reasons in Brief
-
Broad connectivity across cloud, legacy, IoT, and unstructured data
-
Low-code/no-code accessibility for business users
-
Enterprise-grade scalability, security, and compliance
-
Unified platform for integration, automation, and analytics
-
Transparent pricing with reduced total cost of ownership
-
Faster deployment through prebuilt connectors and templates
Conclusion: Choosing the Right iPaaS for Future Growth
When comparing Make vs Workato vs eZintegrations, the right choice depends on both current requirements and future scalability.
-
Make is suitable for small teams and simple SaaS automation
-
Workato fits mid-to-large enterprises focused on SaaS-centric workflows
-
eZintegrations is ideal for enterprises managing complex, hybrid, data-intensive environments
For organizations aiming to future-proof integration, reduce operational complexity, and enable enterprise-wide automation with minimal coding, eZintegrations provides the strongest foundation for sustainable growth.
References
FAQ’s
1. Is coding required to use eZintegrations?
No eZintegrations is designed as a low code no code platform. Business users can map data create workflows and manage integrations through a browser-based drag and drop interface.
2. Can eZintegrations connect to both cloud SaaS apps and legacy on premise systems?
Yes. The platform supports hybrid environments databases on premise applications cloud SaaS APIs and more. It allows real time or batch data transfers across diverse systems.
3. How does security and data governance work with eZintegrations?
eZintegrations offers data encryption for data at rest and in motion role-based access control and support for compliance requirements important for regulated industries.
4. Is the platform suitable for high volume and enterprise scale data workflows?
Yes. eZintegrations is built for scalability capable of handling large data volume transfers real time syncing batch processing and complex workflows across systems.
5. What are common limitations or challenges with eZintegrations?
Some users report occasional performance issues under heavy loads or difficulties with extremely complex or custom workflows. The community and documentation ecosystem can be less mature for edge cases.