Make vs MuleSoft vs eZintegrations – Choosing the Right Platform for Automation and Integration
December 20, 2025TL; DR
The blog explains and compares Make, MuleSoft, and eZintegrations as integration and automation platforms. It highlights what each tool is best suited for, their scalability, security, deployment options, and use cases, and concludes that eZintegrations offers the most balanced solution for organizations with complex, growing integration needs.
Introduction
What is the difference between Make, MuleSoft, and eZintegrations?
Make, MuleSoft, and eZintegrations are integration platforms that help businesses connect applications and automate workflows, but they differ significantly in scale, complexity, and enterprise readiness. Make focuses on simple cloud automation, MuleSoft targets large API-driven enterprises, and eZintegrations combines enterprise-grade scalability with ease of use for growing organizations.
Comparing Make vs MuleSoft vs eZintegrations helps organizations choose the right platform based on automation complexity, data volume, and long-term scalability requirements.
The global iPaaS market was valued at around USD 12.98 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to approximately USD 211.36 billion by 2035, exhibiting a ~28.9 % CAGR over the forecast period.
Company Overview and General Information
What is Make used for?
Make is a cloud-based automation platform designed for small to medium workflows that connect popular SaaS applications.
Definition: Make is an automation tool that links cloud apps using triggers and actions.
How it works: Users create visual scenarios to automate repetitive tasks such as CRM updates or email notifications.
When to use: Best suited for teams with low data volume and limited integration complexity.
Make supports hundreds of cloud applications commonly used in marketing, sales, and productivity, but it does not natively support large-scale enterprise systems or on-premises environments.
What is MuleSoft and why do enterprises use it?
MuleSoft is an enterprise integration platform that specializes in API-led connectivity for large organizations.
Definition: MuleSoft is an API-centric integration platform that enables scalable system-to-system connectivity.
How it works: It uses APIs to orchestrate data flows across cloud and on-premises systems.
When to use: Ideal for enterprises requiring governance, compliance, and complex integration architectures.
MuleSoft’s Anypoint Platform is widely adopted in regulated industries such as finance and healthcare, where API management and security are critical.
What is eZintegrations and how is it different?
eZintegrations is a cloud-based enterprise integration platform designed to automate workflows across cloud, on-premises, and legacy systems.
Definition: eZintegrations is a hybrid iPaaS that combines workflow automation, AI-powered data processing, and enterprise connectivity.
How it works: It connects applications, databases, ERP, CRM, and unstructured data sources in a single automation layer.
When to use: Best for organizations planning growth and managing complex, multi-system workflows.
Unlike many iPaaS tools, eZintegrations supports both real-time and batch processing at enterprise scale, enabling high-volume operations without performance degradation.
Product and Integration Capabilities
How do integration capabilities differ across platforms?
Make supports simple app-to-app automation, MuleSoft focuses on API-led enterprise integration, and eZintegrations enables full end-to-end orchestration across cloud, on-premises, and legacy systems.
-
Make is optimized for lightweight SaaS workflows such as syncing spreadsheets or sending notifications.
-
MuleSoft uses APIs to connect large enterprise systems in governed environments.
-
eZintegrations integrates ERP, CRM, databases, legacy systems, and unstructured data within a single automation layer.
Deployment Options
Which platforms support on-premises and hybrid deployment?
Make is cloud-only, MuleSoft supports cloud and on-premises deployments, and eZintegrations enables seamless hybrid integration.
-
Make: Cloud-only deployment with limited infrastructure control.
-
MuleSoft: Hybrid deployment with strong governance.
-
eZintegrations: Unified cloud platform with native on-premises connectivity.
Hybrid integration reduces operational complexity and improves data consistency across environments.
Scalability and Performance
Which platform scales best for enterprise workloads?
eZintegrations and MuleSoft are designed for enterprise-scale workloads, while Make is best suited for low-volume automation.
-
Make typically handles thousands of operations per day and is not designed for high-throughput enterprise data flows.
-
MuleSoft can process millions of API calls daily, but scaling requires dedicated development and infrastructure management.
-
eZintegrations supports high-volume real-time and batch processing, enabling enterprises to process millions of records per day with built-in fault tolerance and monitoring.
Forrester’s 2024 Automation Survey captures insights from automation leaders across industries on how organizations are approaching automation strategy in 2024. It reflects current priorities, investments, technology trends, and the evolving role of automation at the enterprise level.
Security Features
How do these platforms ensure data security?
All three platforms use encryption, but enterprise security depth varies significantly.
-
Make: Basic encryption and role management suitable for small teams.
-
MuleSoft: Advanced role-based access control, API governance, and compliance frameworks.
-
eZintegrations: Encryption at rest and in transit, two-factor authentication, detailed audit logs, and real-time monitoring dashboards.
Business Process Automation
What types of workflows can each platform automate?
Make automates simple workflows, MuleSoft orchestrates APIs, and eZintegrations automates complete business processes.
Examples:
-
ERP synchronization
-
CRM data updates
-
Supply chain automation
-
Financial data processing
AI-powered automation improves operational efficiency by reducing manual processing of unstructured data such as PDFs and emails.
Comparison Table: Make vs MuleSoft vs eZintegrations
| Feature | Make | MuleSoft | eZintegrations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Typical Use Case | Simple cloud automation and workflow tasks | API management and complex integration | Hybrid integration and end-to-end workflow automation |
| Integration Coverage | Cloud applications and custom APIs | Cloud and on-premises systems, APIs, databases | Cloud apps, ERP, CRM, databases, legacy systems, IoT, and AI workflows |
| Deployment | Cloud only | Cloud and on-premises | Cloud with seamless on-premises integration |
| Scalability | Small to medium workloads | Large-scale workloads | High-volume real-time and batch processing |
| Security | Standard encryption and access control | Advanced security, role-based access, and compliance | Strong encryption, two-factor authentication, role-based control, and auditing |
| Customization | Moderate workflow customization | High customization requiring technical development | Very high customization with low-code, no-code, AI workflows, and custom connectors |
| Analytics & Reporting | Basic logs | API and workflow monitoring | Advanced dashboards, performance metrics, and error tracking |
| Ecosystem & Partners | Popular cloud applications | Integration partners and ecosystem tools | Salesforce, Oracle, Microsoft, and custom enterprise systems |
| Pricing Transparency | Operation-based pricing | Subscription-based pricing | Flexible subscription aligned with usage and value |
| Best Suited For | Small to medium teams | Large teams with strong technical expertise | Medium to large teams with complex integration needs |
How do pricing and cost models compare?
Make uses operation-based pricing, MuleSoft follows high-cost enterprise subscriptions, and eZintegrations offers flexible pricing aligned with usage and value.
Supporting detail:
-
Make: Costs increase rapidly as task volume grows, which can limit scalability for growing businesses.
-
MuleSoft: Enterprise licensing is viable mainly for large organizations with dedicated budgets.
-
eZintegrations: Uses flexible subscription models that scale with integration complexity rather than raw task counts.
Gartner notes that unpredictable automation pricing is a major barrier to long-term platform adoption in growing organizations.
How do ERP and CRM integrations compare?
eZintegrations and MuleSoft provide deep ERP and CRM integration, while Make offers limited support.
-
Make: Connects to popular CRMs but lacks native enterprise ERP depth.
-
MuleSoft: Supports SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce through API-led connectivity.
-
eZintegrations: Provides native and custom connectors for Salesforce, Oracle, Microsoft Dynamics, SAP, and legacy ERP systems.
Hybrid ERP integration is critical for enterprises modernizing legacy systems while adopting cloud platforms.
Why Choose eZintegrations Over Make and MuleSoft?
What makes eZintegrations a future-ready integration platform?
eZintegrations combines enterprise scalability with usability, making it accessible to both IT teams and business users.
Key advantages:
-
Supports cloud, on-premises, and legacy systems
-
Handles structured and unstructured data
-
Scales without workflow or data volume limitations
-
Offers enterprise security with low-code flexibility
This balance of technical depth and usability positions eZintegrations as a long-term integration solution.
When to Choose Make vs MuleSoft
When should you choose Make?
Choose Make if you need quick, simple automation without technical overhead.
-
You are a small team or startup
-
Your workflows connect cloud SaaS apps only (email, CRM, marketing tools)
-
Automation is linear and low volume (simple triggers and actions)
-
You want a no-code, visual builder that non-technical users can manage
-
Budget is limited and enterprise governance is not required
In short: Make is best for lightweight cloud automation and fast setup.
When should you choose MuleSoft?
Choose MuleSoft if you need enterprise-grade integration and API governance.
-
You are a large enterprise (hundreds to thousands of employees)
-
You manage complex system landscapes (ERP, CRM, databases, legacy apps)
-
API management, security, and compliance are critical
-
You require on-premise and hybrid deployments
-
You have dedicated technical teams to build and maintain integrations
-
High data volume and mission-critical integrations are involved
In short: MuleSoft is best for complex, regulated, API-driven enterprise environments.
Conclusion
Which integration platform is best for long-term growth?
Make is best for small teams, MuleSoft suits highly technical enterprises, and eZintegrations provides the most balanced solution for organizations with complex integration needs.
For businesses planning growth, hybrid environments, and AI-driven automation, eZintegrations delivers the highest flexibility, scalability, and operational efficiency.
References
FAQ’s
1. Can eZintegrations connect both cloud and on premise systems?
Yes. It unifies cloud applications, internal servers, databases, and legacy systems into a single platform.
2. Do I need coding experience to use eZintegrations?
No. The platform offers a low code and no code interface that allows business users to build workflows easily.
3. How does eZintegrations ensure data security?
It includes encryption for data at rest and in transit, two factor authentication, role based access control, and auditing features.
4. Can eZintegrations process unstructured data?
Yes. It can handle emails, PDFs, documents, and other unstructured formats using AI powered workflows.
5. Is eZintegrations suitable for large enterprises?
Yes. It is designed for medium to large enterprises with complex integrations, multiple systems, and high volume workflows.